On 14/12/10 00:20, Warren Young wrote:
> On 12/13/2010 3:02 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>> On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 14:49 -0700, Warren Young wrote:
>>> C# exists more for political and business
>>> reasons than technical ones; it fills the same space Java could fill, in
>>> a platform-agnostic world.
>>
>> False. C# has significant technical advantages over Java - good
>> Generics and LINQ just being two.
>
> I meant to say it was *created* more for political and business reasons
> than technical ones. Yes, the two have diverged since that time.
>
>> Another advantage over Java is the namespaces were not created by a
>> addled drug addict.
>
> I don't think naming arguments hold much water. Memorization is a key
> part of learning any programming language. Nothing is truly intuitive
> in computing. ("The only intuitive interface is the nipple.") You may
> like your set of names more than another, but they all have to be
> memorized if you want to use them.
>
> To the OP's complaint, I think both languages have a similar problem,
> that being the depth and scope of each platform's namespaces. They're
> both elephantine. With Perl, at least, you can start by ignoring CPAN
> and everything they added in Perl 5. The Perl 4 core is a powerful but
> readily grasped step up from shell scripting.
>
> Besides, you shouldn't be throwing stones. There's another "mono" that
> is currently more common, according to Google.
>
>>> Another poster mentioned a documentation advantage, but I imagine a lot
>>> of that advantage is eroded by being Windows and Microsoft centric.
>>
>> ...The portability is extremely good....
>
> "Extremely?" http://www.mono-project.com/Compatibility
>
> Mono is an impressive project, but you can't tell me someone wouldn't
> get into trouble by developing using Microsoft's documentation only.
>
> Besides, CentOS doesn't come with a CLR, so I suspect it's not portable
> enough for the OP.
Mono is a Intellectual Property and licence minefield.
<http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/reports/6801/1/>
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mono_%28software%29#Mono_and_Microsoft.E2.80.99s_patents>
And considering what's happening with Novell these days as well, I would
be concerned relying on Mono until things gets clearer. The Microsoft
agreement and Novell had is about to expire soon as well, iirc.
kind regards,
David Sommerseth
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
