Re: OT: programming language for morons (newbie friendly language in Open Source world)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On 12/13/2010 3:02 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 14:49 -0700, Warren Young wrote:
>> C# exists more for political and business
>> reasons than technical ones; it fills the same space Java could fill, in
>> a platform-agnostic world.
>
> False.  C# has significant technical advantages over Java - good
> Generics and LINQ just being two.

I meant to say it was *created* more for political and business reasons 
than technical ones.  Yes, the two have diverged since that time.

> Another advantage over Java is the namespaces were not created by a
> addled drug addict.

I don't think naming arguments hold much water.  Memorization is a key 
part of learning any programming language.  Nothing is truly intuitive 
in computing.  ("The only intuitive interface is the nipple.")  You may 
like your set of names more than another, but they all have to be 
memorized if you want to use them.

To the OP's complaint, I think both languages have a similar problem, 
that being the depth and scope of each platform's namespaces.  They're 
both elephantine.  With Perl, at least, you can start by ignoring CPAN 
and everything they added in Perl 5.  The Perl 4 core is a powerful but 
readily grasped step up from shell scripting.

Besides, you shouldn't be throwing stones.  There's another "mono" that 
is currently more common, according to Google.

>> Another poster mentioned a documentation advantage, but I imagine a lot
>> of that advantage is eroded by being Windows and Microsoft centric.
>
> ...The portability is extremely good....

"Extremely?"  http://www.mono-project.com/Compatibility

Mono is an impressive project, but you can't tell me someone wouldn't 
get into trouble by developing using Microsoft's documentation only.

Besides, CentOS doesn't come with a CLR, so I suspect it's not portable 
enough for the OP.

> Strictness is a *feature*.  Especially for someone who wants to
> initially learn programming.

The OP already tried that, with Java, and didn't like it.

The argument's bogus anyway.  Many experienced programmers want to teach 
strictness from the start, apparently without considering how many of 
their peers started with a non-strict language.  BASIC, shell, 
JavaScript, PHP...classic beginner languages each, and probably all with 
bigger installed bases than any other interpreted language mentioned in 
this thread.  Dijkstra's assertion that such languages "...mentally 
mutilate [programmers] beyond hope of regeneration..." is disproven by 
decades of experience.

I'm assuming you don't wish to argue that the vast majority of 
programmers working today are mental cripples.

> -1 Perl is a withering dinosaur.

What roth said. :)
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux