On 12/13/2010 6:08 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote: > >> >> I doubt if there are a lot that can simultaneously think in procedural >> and object concepts, though. Someone who learns that code and data are >> different things and that data is not to be trusted will have a hard >> time dealing with objects where the only way to access data is to >> execute code associated with it. >> > > I don't know about that. I started on Apple Integer BASIC back in 1980, > dropped to assembly on multiple platforms, and eventually ended up doing > OO style design in Perl in the 90s *before* it officially had OO. I > remember my sister commenting something to the effect that I seemed to > design code mentally in OO styles regardless of the actual > implementation language a decade or so ago. It's one thing to build complex data structures (like making your basic C data type "array of struct ...") so you can iterate nicely, but something else to think the code belongs to it. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos