Re: Issues with CentOS in enterprise

[Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen@xxxxxx>]

2010/12/13 Gé Weijers <ge@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>
> On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>> RHEL is much better about that, although by now  the "production" RHEL
>> 5 is 4 years out of date, the "leading edge" RHEL 6 is now one year
>> out of date after the lengthy release testing, and CentOS will always
>> lag that.
>
> I believe "out of date" is the wrong wording. RHEL/CentOS 5 is maintained,
> i.e. security issues and bugs are fixed. There's nothing "out of date"
> about a tool that works and is cost-effective. RHEL 6 still has to prove
> itself.


RHEL provides 10 year support cycle, I hope Centos can do same :)

--
Eero
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos