It is not their issue really. SELinux is a different security model that
departs from the norm. It's not as easy to port if you want to use it. That
said, Cpanel works fine on CentOS 4/ RHE4/ Fedora Core 3 if you disable
SELinux. I have it running fine (with a bit of incompatibilities on Exim
install, but got that nailed). It would require almost a total rewrite of
most portions of Cpanel to make it work (on top of defining the proper
policies) if you look at how their security model has always been based
around the permissions of the files and file ownership rather than a
role-based concept.
-----Original Message-----
From: centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Beau Henderson
Sent: 09 March 2005 18:33
To: CentOS discussion and information list
Subject: Re: [Centos] 3.3 or 3.4
cPanel are usually pretty good at spitting out releases shortly after an OS
is debuted ( at least compared to other popular commercial control panel
vendors ). CentOS4 isn't as easy to port to as previous OS's mostly due to
SELinux being implemented ( notice no support for FC 3 ? ). Either way,
CentOS4 has only just been released, sure the beta was out, but many chances
happen between beta and final. Beta's are not exactly what you want to use,
to create a commercial product on. Hold tight, I have a feeling Nick ( head
cpanel dev ) is working tirelessly to push it out.
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 22:41:05 +1100, Matt Bottrell <mbottrell@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Blah Cpanel. :-P
>
> Pretty lax of them not to have RHELv4 ready... the betas been around
> for a while.
>
>
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 08:28:56 -0500, Verdon Vaillancourt <vern@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> > If you're running cpanel/whm on your server, going to CentOS 4 on a
> > production box would not be a good idea at this time, unless you
> > REALLY know what you're doing
> >
> >
> > On 7-Mar-05, at 8:23 AM, Collins Richey wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 11:46:20 +0000,
> > > paul.g.barnett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <paul.g.barnett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> > >> I have just successfuly converted three former wbel3 boxes to
> > >> centos
> > >> 3.3 -
> > >> 3.3 because that is what the instructions in the wbel conversion
> > >> FAQ specified. Now I see that the latest version of
> > >> 3
> > >> is 3.4.
> > >>
> > >> Am I missing something?
> > >
> > > Yes, it's called CentOS4.0-final.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Collins
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > CentOS mailing list
> > > CentOS@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
--
Beau Henderson
http://www.iminteractive.net
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
