On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 08:50 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 11/24/10 8:37 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> > On 11/24/2010 02:34 PM, Toralf Lund wrote:
> >>> Thats good, but how is that even remotely related to his list ?
> >> It's *remotely* related in that it means someone, somewhere must have
> >> source code that would probably compile more or less directly under
> >> CentOS, for the (currently unsupported) software in question.
> > well, ok :)
> > but it would still be nice to see what people think about a
> > centos-social or a centos-offtopic or a centos-chatter list.
> What we need is a "What would a good sysadmin think?" list where one of the
> criteria for being a good sysadmin would obviously be that you know something
> about Centos but the rest of the scope covers applications, conversions, product
> comparisons, legal issues, etc. The kind of stuff most of us do every day...
Why not head over to LOPSA and join one of their lists?
<https://lopsa.org/>
<https://lopsa.org/mailman/listinfo>
<quote>
The League of Professional System Administrators (LOPSA) is a nonprofit
corporation with members throughout the world. Our mission is to advance
the practice of system administration; to support, recognize, educate,
and encourage its practitioners; and to serve the public through
education and outreach on system administration issues.
LOPSA membership benefits fall into two classes. The first involves
support of you as a member and a sysadmin. LOPSA is working to provide
educational and networking opportunities, a forum for support and ideas,
and an active community engaged in discussion of sysadmin issues.
</quote>
I've always though communities making *-offtopic lists didn't make much
sense - go find an on-topic list.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
