On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 18:37:03 +1100, Matt Bottrell <mbottrell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I believe CentOS follows the RH schedule... as long as RH support > it... so do CentOS. :) Right, this is not a backport / patch project. It's "only" a recompile of RH-provided SRPMs. Francois
[Centos] CentOS Release Lifespan
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: [Centos] CentOS Release Lifespan
- From: frcaen at gmail.com (Francois Caen)
- Date: Tue Mar 8 07:57:32 2005
- In-reply-to: <2fa9551e050307233772ad87a4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <A7B0A9F02975A74A845FE85D0B95B8FA41ECB4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <e00942e4050303105246fa4ea5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2fa9551e050307233772ad87a4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References:
- [Centos] CentOS Release Lifespan
- From: Marc Powell
- [Centos] CentOS Release Lifespan
- From: Collins Richey
- [Centos] CentOS Release Lifespan
- From: Matt Bottrell
- [Centos] CentOS Release Lifespan
- Prev by Date: [Centos] Security/Errata mailing List
- Next by Date: [Centos] Bad ISO
- Previous by thread: [Centos] CentOS Release Lifespan
- Next by thread: [Centos] CentOS 4 installer kernel version
- Index(es):
 |