Collins Richey said: >> is it typical to announce critical errata on this list? > > I certainly hope so! Wasn't moving the traffic the whole point of creating the -announce list? -- William Hooper
[Centos] CentOS-4 i386 errata: Critical firefox security update
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: [Centos] CentOS-4 i386 errata: Critical firefox security update
- From: whooperhsd3 at earthlink.net (William Hooper)
- Date: Wed Mar 2 14:27:38 2005
- In-reply-to: <e00942e4050301185333dfe09b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <1109730979.25761.31.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1109731447.10720.37.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <e00942e4050301185333dfe09b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Follow-Ups:
- [Centos] CentOS-4 i386 errata: Critical firefox security update
- From: Lance Davis
- [Centos] CentOS-4 i386 errata: Critical firefox security update
- From: Henk van Lingen
- [Centos] CentOS-4 i386 errata: Critical firefox security update
- References:
- [Centos] CentOS-4 i386 errata: Critical firefox security update
- From: Johnny Hughes
- [Centos] CentOS-4 i386 errata: Critical firefox security update
- From: Craig White
- [Centos] CentOS-4 i386 errata: Critical firefox security update
- From: Collins Richey
- [Centos] CentOS-4 i386 errata: Critical firefox security update
- Prev by Date: [Centos] question about centos4
- Next by Date: [Centos] CentOS-4 i386 errata: Critical firefox security update
- Previous by thread: [Centos] CentOS-4 i386 errata: Critical firefox security update
- Next by thread: [Centos] CentOS-4 i386 errata: Critical firefox security update
- Index(es):
 |