I think the main question is - whether changing Red Hat to CentOS
everywhere except in the copyright and noting the change would be
considered a substantial modification...
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Lance Davis wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Michael Best wrote:
>
> > Maciej ?>>enczykowski wrote:
> > >>Here read this:
> > >>http://beta.centos.org/centos-4/4.0/docs/html/rhel-ig-x8664-multi-en-4/legalnotice.html
> > >>
> > >>-Mike
> >
> > The Open Content license does permit derived works, modified versions
> > must say they are modified, and have bibliographic attribution to the
> > original work.
>
> That is not my understanding having read it.
> >
>
> as in :-
>
> 'Distribution of substantively modified versions of this document is
> prohibited without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.'
>
> That being an optional overrider on the opencontent license.
>
> as in :-
>
> The author(s) and/or publisher of an Open Publication-licensed document
> may elect certain options by appending language to the reference to or
> copy of the license. ...
>
>
> A. To prohibit distribution of substantively modified versions without the
> explicit permission of the author(s). "Substantive modification" is
> defined as a change to the semantic content of the document, and excludes
> mere changes in format or typographical corrections.
>
> Lance
>
>
