I think the main question is - whether changing Red Hat to CentOS everywhere except in the copyright and noting the change would be considered a substantial modification... On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Lance Davis wrote: > On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Michael Best wrote: > > > Maciej ?>>enczykowski wrote: > > >>Here read this: > > >>http://beta.centos.org/centos-4/4.0/docs/html/rhel-ig-x8664-multi-en-4/legalnotice.html > > >> > > >>-Mike > > > > The Open Content license does permit derived works, modified versions > > must say they are modified, and have bibliographic attribution to the > > original work. > > That is not my understanding having read it. > > > > as in :- > > 'Distribution of substantively modified versions of this document is > prohibited without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.' > > That being an optional overrider on the opencontent license. > > as in :- > > The author(s) and/or publisher of an Open Publication-licensed document > may elect certain options by appending language to the reference to or > copy of the license. ... > > > A. To prohibit distribution of substantively modified versions without the > explicit permission of the author(s). "Substantive modification" is > defined as a change to the semantic content of the document, and excludes > mere changes in format or typographical corrections. > > Lance > >