Vote For CentOS :)

[lesmikesell at gmail.com (Les Mikesell)]

On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 12:06, Simon Perreault wrote:

> > I am not a lawyer, but I don't see any way to reconcile this statement
> > with a restriction that any particular copy of it may only be installed
> > on one computer, even if that restriction comes from a separate
> > contract that provides your service agreement.
> 
> Isn't it acceptable for Red Hat to sell SLAs on a per-computer basis?

Of course.  What does an SLA have to do with restricting copying or
redistribution?

> I really don't get where you're going.

What kind of restriction would be excluded by the GPL if not ones that
restrict copying, installing on additional machines, or redistribution?

-- 
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx