On Thursday 02 June 2005 12:04, Les Mikesell wrote: > I am not a lawyer, but I don't see any way to reconcile this statement > with a restriction that any particular copy of it may only be installed > on one computer, even if that restriction comes from a separate > contract that provides your service agreement. Isn't it acceptable for Red Hat to sell SLAs on a per-computer basis? I really don't get where you're going.
Vote For CentOS :)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Vote For CentOS :)
- From: nomis80 at lqt.ca (Simon Perreault)
- Date: Thu Jun 2 17:06:22 2005
- In-reply-to: <1117728271.10602.28.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <1117712136.2514.136.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200506021118.11358.nomis80@xxxxxx> <1117728271.10602.28.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Follow-Ups:
- Vote For CentOS :)
- From: Les Mikesell
- Vote For CentOS :)
- References:
- Vote For CentOS :)
- From: Johnny Hughes
- Vote For CentOS :)
- From: Simon Perreault
- Vote For CentOS :)
- From: Les Mikesell
- Vote For CentOS :)
- Prev by Date: Vote For CentOS :)
- Next by Date: Reboots
- Previous by thread: Vote For CentOS :)
- Next by thread: Vote For CentOS :)
- Index(es):
 |