Re: logwatch patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Kai Schaetzl wrote:

> Robert Tate wrote on Sun, 25 Dec 2005 01:22:18 -0500:
> 
>> I just installed CentOS a few weeks ago and am still learning about this
>> distros' methods and such, but I vote for sending out a patch or fixed
>> package for it.
> 
> You should be aware that the Logwatch installed with RHEL and CentOS is
> *quite* old. Logwatch current is at 7.1. I installed it two weeks ago or
> so and it works fine. I don't remember getting any yum information,
> though. I didn't notice that until you mentioned it. I'll check about this
> when I'm back from vacation. Maybe it was just a period with no updates.
> If you do any tuning and want to have that included in the source you
> better patch against a current Logwatch and submit that diff.
> All in all the logwatch scripts look very much like catering for RH
> products, so I'd be a bit puzzled if a newer Logwatch would miss on this.
> I installed it on Suse systems as well and had to tune it heavily to get
> some decent reporting because it missed the log files and is very
> dependant on applications logging to their own log file.
> 
Becuase of this thread I installed the newest logwatch program and can confirm 
that it =does= show a yum output of what programs have been 
installed/removed, and it all works very well. 

Sharon.
-- 
 11:49:22 up 3 days,  2:12,  1 user,  load average: 1.48, 1.49, 1.45
A taste of linux http://www.sharons.org.uk/taste/index.html
efever http://www.efever.blogspot.com/
Centos 4.2, KDE 3.5.0-1.7, OpenOffice 2.0.1
Registered Linux user 334501

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux