On Sun, 2005-12-25 at 19:53 -0600, Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote:
> > My system, 4.2 i386, fully current AFAIK, does not have
> >
> > scripts/shared/applyyumdate
> >
> > but does have applyusdate.
>
> The applyyumdate is new file (intriduced by patch). It does not exist
> in current logwatch.
> <snip very useful and informative explanations>
Alexsandr,
Thanks for that education. I have much to learn about all this.
I feel I may have wasted list time too. When I looked at the patch, I
just scanned for the "header" lines. Seeing the ".orig" I presumed there
was a pre-existing file. If I had looked more closely, I would have seen
it was a new file.
On Sun, 2005-12-25 at 11:07 -0500, Robert Tate wrote:
> scripts/shared/applyyumdate is a new file. The patch is to create it and point to in in the other files.
>
> On Sunday 25 December 2005 09:56 am, William L. Maltby wrote:
> <snip>
Robert thanks for the reply. As noted above, I may have wasted your time.
Bill
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20051227/64e80026/attachment.bin
