Am Sa, den 03.12.2005 schrieb Kai Schaetzl um 22:31:
> Alexander Dalloz wrote on Fri, 02 Dec 2005 15:36:55 +0100:
> > At least narrowed in the long run comparable values you can get by
> > lm_sensors, if your motherboard has a sensor chip which is supported by
> > that tool. "yum install lm_sensors" and run "sensors-detect".
>
> Actually, sensors (lm_sensors) gives me mostly bogus values on all
> machines that I tried it recently, although I ran a successful
> sensors-detect. The only thing which seems to be correct are fan speeds.
> voltage and temperature are way off (if they were true the machine
> wouldn't start up at all or burnt to death). Is there anything I have to
> do after the sensors-detect run?
>
> Kai
You may have to adjust settings in /etc/sensors.conf, depending on the
sensors chip the motherboard has. It is too a good idea to read about
the sensors chip and its support by lm_sensors on the project's website.
Sometimes the chip manufacturer does not provide information about the
hardware, so that reverse engineering has been done.
Alexander
--
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773
legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp
Serendipity 18:29:00 up 36 days, 16:29, load average: 0.25, 0.17, 0.11
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20051204/d195f89e/attachment.bin
