Mark Sargent wrote on Thu, 01 Dec 2005 15:35:37 +0900: > CLASS_D_MULTICAST="224.0.0.0/4" > CLASS_E_RESERVED_NET="240.0.0.0/4" I do have 5 for the latter in my rules. I didn't invent them, though ;-) Kai -- Kai Sch?tzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
Default CentOS(Redhat) iptables, Secure?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Default CentOS(Redhat) iptables, Secure?
- From: maillists at conactive.com (Kai Schaetzl)
- Date: Thu Dec 1 21:31:21 2005
- In-reply-to: <438E99B9.50307@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <438D9811.8010804@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1133353640.12053.80.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051130091634.2g9ehsl3i8gkwg8g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <VA.00001ef5.038def0a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <438E92BC.5060708@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <438E99B9.50307@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References:
- Default CentOS(Redhat) iptables, Secure?
- From: Mark Sargent
- Default CentOS(Redhat) iptables, Secure?
- From: Johnny Hughes
- Default CentOS(Redhat) iptables, Secure?
- From: Aleksandar Milivojevic
- Default CentOS(Redhat) iptables, Secure?
- From: Kai Schaetzl
- Default CentOS(Redhat) iptables, Secure?
- From: Aleksandar Milivojevic
- Default CentOS(Redhat) iptables, Secure?
- From: Mark Sargent
- Default CentOS(Redhat) iptables, Secure?
- Prev by Date: Default CentOS(Redhat) iptables, Secure?
- Next by Date: access to httpd logs
- Previous by thread: Default CentOS(Redhat) iptables, Secure?
- Next by thread: Default CentOS(Redhat) iptables, Secure?
- Index(es):
 |