HI All, thanx. Interesting reading. I'm following this tut, http://www.sns.ias.edu/~jns/?pagename=Rules and have a question about the below. Why does the author use /4 for both.? Shouldn't the 1st 1 be /3.? I'm also studying CCNA and thought it looked wrong. Anyway, besides that, it's a good learning site. Kudos to the author, indeed. Cheers. Mark Sargent. CLASS_D_MULTICAST="224.0.0.0/4" CLASS_E_RESERVED_NET="240.0.0.0/4"
Default CentOS(Redhat) iptables, Secure?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Default CentOS(Redhat) iptables, Secure?
- From: powderkeg at snow.email.ne.jp (Mark Sargent)
- Date: Thu Dec 1 06:31:45 2005
- In-reply-to: <438E92BC.5060708@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <438D9811.8010804@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1133353640.12053.80.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051130091634.2g9ehsl3i8gkwg8g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <VA.00001ef5.038def0a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <438E92BC.5060708@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Follow-Ups:
- Default CentOS(Redhat) iptables, Secure?
- From: Kai Schaetzl
- Default CentOS(Redhat) iptables, Secure?
- References:
- Default CentOS(Redhat) iptables, Secure?
- From: Mark Sargent
- Default CentOS(Redhat) iptables, Secure?
- From: Johnny Hughes
- Default CentOS(Redhat) iptables, Secure?
- From: Aleksandar Milivojevic
- Default CentOS(Redhat) iptables, Secure?
- From: Kai Schaetzl
- Default CentOS(Redhat) iptables, Secure?
- From: Aleksandar Milivojevic
- Default CentOS(Redhat) iptables, Secure?
- Prev by Date: why was LILO removed from centOS 4.2?
- Next by Date: Too much memory cache being used while moving large file
- Previous by thread: Default CentOS(Redhat) iptables, Secure?
- Next by thread: Default CentOS(Redhat) iptables, Secure?
- Index(es):
 |