On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 18:38 -0700, Todd Cary wrote:
> RH 9 was like that and so was FC 3,
Because they were ... can I say it? Like ".1" releases. ;->
> BUT FC 4 was something else...
Because it was ... can I say it? Like a ".0" release. ;->
[ See the continuing theme I made on "this is why it helps to know what
is a ".0 like release" in the Fedora Core world? ;-]
> But I do feel a litfle guilt (sure it will diminish in time) because
> of all of the hours RH put into making RHEL 4 work smoothly.
Why feel guilty? Red Hat puts a lot of people on GPL stuff they don't
ever see a dime for, stuff that goes into the stock kernel, GCC (even,
gasp, non-Linux targets!), etc... So why feel guilty?
Red Hat has always been, and always will be, a GPL company.
That's all they do, GPL, GPL, GPL, it's their blood.
Whether it's Linux or otherwise (and they do a bit of otherwise too ;-),
it's GPL.
> not RH and so far nobdy has sent me a bill :-) !
You can get support from Red Hat without paying a dime too.
--
Bryan J. Smith b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx http://thebs413.blogspot.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The best things in life are NOT free - which is why life is easiest if
you save all the bills until you can share them with the perfect woman
