Understanably, but I prefer to built my own scripts, rather than using
the init'ed versions. On every occasion the requirements differ.
Anycase, Joe specifically asked for CBQ, if CBQ works for him, he can
continue using it with cbq.init...
On 8/8/05, Deim ?goston <ago@xxxxxx> wrote:
> HTB has a htb.init script too. It's far better than CBQ if you want to
> "hardcode" limits and can narrow the targets to fix machines and
> protocols.
> (I mean: all the ftp traffic or all that 192.168.1.20 can eat up from
> bandwith).
> bye,
> Ago
>
> > CBQ is still part of CentOS, but i'd highly recommend using HTB instead.
> >
> > If you want to use CBQ, you can the cbq.init script from
> > http://sourceforge.net/projects/cbqinit/ and I'd also recommend having
> > a look at http://lartc.org
> >
> > HTH
> >
> > On 8/8/05, Joe Klemmer <klemmerj@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Since shapecfg is no longer part of the distro what are people
> >> using in
> >> place of cbq to limit/throttle bandwidth? I have an ftp mirror that, if
> >> left unchecked, will suck up the entire bandwidth of the CoLo site.
> >>
> >> TIA,
> >> Joe
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
--
Kenneth Kalmer
kenneth.kalmer@xxxxxxxxx
Folding@home stats
http://vspx27.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/main.py?qtype=userpage&username=kenneth%2Ekalmer
