Oh i understand. That was not criticism..just pure curiosity.
Chris Mauritz wrote:
> William Warren wrote:
>
>> Raid0? I am assuming you are going for the speed benefits(which are
>> neglible at worst and not 2x the speed at best) instead of data security?
>>
>
> Perhaps data security really isn't an issue for the poster. For
> example, I've got a rack of servers with identical content. Except for
> the logs, everything on any of the servers is really expendible (as long
> as they ALL don't fail...heh). So I mirror the partition containing the
> log data and periodically aggregate all the logs to somewhere "safe."
> As a result, I feel comfy using RAID 0 for the data partitions on those
> servers.
>
> Cheers,
>
> C
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
--
Computer Housecalls, Networks, Security, Web Design:
http://www.emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com
My "Foundation" verse:
Isa 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper;
and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou
shalt condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD,
and their righteousness is of me, saith the LORD.
-- carpe ductum -- "Grab the tape"
CDTT (Certified Duct Tape Technician)
Linux user #322099
Machines:
206822
256638
276825
http://counter.li.org/
