William Warren wrote: > Raid0? I am assuming you are going for the speed benefits(which are > neglible at worst and not 2x the speed at best) instead of data security? > Perhaps data security really isn't an issue for the poster. For example, I've got a rack of servers with identical content. Except for the logs, everything on any of the servers is really expendible (as long as they ALL don't fail...heh). So I mirror the partition containing the log data and periodically aggregate all the logs to somewhere "safe." As a result, I feel comfy using RAID 0 for the data partitions on those servers. Cheers, C