[Centos] 3Ware Escalade 9500S controller question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">You have to recompile the driver from source every time you do a kernel update. Otherwise works great for me. Dont forget to do optimizations to get max performance, there's some simple ones on 3ware's site that make a nice difference.</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<td><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>&quot;Shawn M. Jones&quot; &lt;smj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&gt;</b></font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Sent by: centos-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx</font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">09/08/2004 10:49 PM</font>
<br>
<td><font size=1 face="Arial">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; To: &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;centos@xxxxxxxxxxx</font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; cc: &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Subject: &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;[Centos] 3Ware Escalade 9500S controller question</font></table>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=2><tt>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>
Hash: SHA1<br>
</tt></font>
<br><font size=2><tt>Greetings folks,<br>
</tt></font>
<br><font size=2><tt>I'm currently redoing my home server as one of the hard drives in my<br>
RAID-1 array went down and I'm going to replace the lot of it with a<br>
3Ware Escalade 9500S RAID capable card and four Seagate 200GB SATA<br>
drives. &nbsp;These drives are supposedly the coolest and quietest SATA<br>
drives available (better than the Maxtors I had anyway) and the capacity<br>
upgrade on the server is worth the $$$ at this point. &nbsp;I'm planning on<br>
running them in RAID-5 for maximum disk space and performance.<br>
</tt></font>
<br><font size=2><tt>Are there any 3Ware Escalade/SATA issues I should be aware of when<br>
building this new server utilizing CentOS-3? &nbsp;The card was supposedly<br>
supported under RH9, so I figured RHEL3 (or clones) would be fine.<br>
</tt></font>
<br><font size=2><tt>Thanks in advance for the feedback,<br>
</tt></font>
<br><font size=2><tt>- --Shawn<br>
</tt></font>
<br><font size=2><tt>- --<br>
- -- Shawn M. Jones<br>
&lt;smj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx&gt;<br>
http://www.littleprojects.org<br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)<br>
</tt></font>
<br><font size=2><tt>iD8DBQFBP9K3gaOAAb5cjIkRArVLAJ90/xrq4j8qsu8oAj6vaJlBS5pUAQCggH3a<br>
fUKM52EQlz/BzR9q5dLKrvQ=<br>
=RfLF<br>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
CentOS mailing list<br>
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxxx<br>
http://www.caosity.org/mailman/listinfo/centos</tt></font>
<br>
<br>



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux