On 09/08/2015 08:02 AM, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: > >> not fragment to a bunch of different individual people making a bunch of >> different RPM sets that the community does not know who produces, etc. >> > > what you're doing its a complete crap, what you said is different from > what you did, why you' (centos virt sig) not contributed to the work of > fedora guys instead of reinventing the wheel ? Because we want to have source code that works on both CentOS-6 (based on RHEL 6 Source, which was based on Fedora 12) and CentOS-7 (based on RHEL 7 Sources, which was based on Fedora 18/19). So, the source code for Fedora 22 will not work with both of those. We DID start with the Fedora 12 version of the RPMs, that worked with CentOS-6 and we have rolled in kernels from the kernel.org LTS tree for stability, etc. We have been producing a CentOS-6 version for several year now. We now need to make that work with CentOS-7. It is not just as simple as taking Fedora code, that is always latest and greatest and recompiling it. If it was, RHEL (and therefore CentOS) would have no need to exist at all. Everyone could just use Fedora for everything.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
