On 09/04/2015 04:39 PM, T.Weyergraf wrote: > > > On 09/03/2015 09:50 PM, Chuck Meade wrote: >> Hi Thomas, > Hi Chuck >> >> This may be old news at this point, but I had 100% identical behavior >> to yours when I tried virtx7-44-testing. >> After looking around a bit I tried "virtx7-44-candidate", in a sibling >> directory to virtx7-44-testing. It has a more >> recent date, so I tried with that and it works fine. It resolves the >> issues listed in your email from 7/7/2015. > Thanks for letting me know. I actually found the "candiate" packages to > work too, when tried those some days after my email. > However, nowadays I build my own Xen rpm's, based on the Fedora 21 > source package. I modified the spec-file to properly build for CentOS 7 > and adapted some of the patches of the Fedora source package. > > To me, the advantage is proper systemd intergration. It has systemd unit > files for all xen-related services. Likewise, I keep the version up to > date to my taste, like running 4.4.3. > My xen-packages work well for me and if anybody is interested, I can > polish things up a bit, setup a repo and make them accessible. What we really need is to make the REAL xen RPMs .. the ones produced in this SIG .. work with systemd. These RPMs are produced by Citrix, so we need to get the right. So, what works and what does not work (ie, no systemd integration problem) needs to be addressed. We don't want to create forked repos, IMHO.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
