Re: LTO tape drives and Bacula for Backups?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- "compdoc" <compdoc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The tape is easily replaceable, without
> having to worry about bad connectors that can plague hot
> swap drive bay equipment. 

I really worry about your staff if you have damaged hot swap anything. How many insertions are they rated for? According to its data sheet, a lower end Tyco/AMP SATA connector measures up against EIA-364-09C (i.e., "Mate and unmated [sic] connector assemblies for 500 cycles at a maximum rate of 200 cycles/hour.") Other relevant forces are on there, and you can read the rest if you're interested here: http://tinyurl.com/ybnacp7 Basically, if you break them, you're doing something wrong or you are buying equipment with counterfeit or excessively substandard parts. I wouldn't consider this to be on the scale of a plague.

> At $45 per tape for 320G of storage, it competes with hard
> drives. In case of tape drive failure, the tapes still work
> with the new drive. And with scsi or sata based tape drives,
> speed is not a problem. 

Plus the cost of the tape drive (~$700), plus time, increased risk (longer backup duration means more risk), deployment flexibility, etc etc etc.

> Combined with disk based network storage, tapes have a place
> in IT.

Yes, archival storage.

-- 
Christopher G. Stach II
http://ldsys.net/~cgs/
_______________________________________________
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS Users]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Xfree86]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux