Re: LTO tape drives and Bacula for Backups?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Feb 10, 2010, at 11:43 AM, compdoc wrote:

> At $45 per tape for 320G of storage, it competes with hard
> drives. In case of tape drive failure, the tapes still work
> with the new drive. And with scsi or sata based tape drives,
> speed is not a problem. 

...or, with 750GB drives today, you could more than double that storage for 25% more per unit. Tapes are more durable than hard drives, but they're hardly impervious, and they certainly aren't higher density when you start backing up many TB. 
_______________________________________________
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS Users]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Xfree86]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux