On Thu, 2021-11-04 at 16:15 -0400, Rich Bowen wrote: > > > On 11/4/21 15:15, Shaun McCance wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm working on revamping the Documentation SIG wiki page, and > > hoping to > > present where we stand to the CentOS board at some point. > > > > https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Documentation > > > > I'd like to have a set of core responsibilities. Proposal: > > > > * Working with the Red Hat documentation folks on publishing > > material > > upstreamed from RHEL. > > > > * Identifying, writing, and maintaining content aside from stuff > > that > > is intended for RHEL, whether that's in manuals or shorter form > > wiki > > material. > > > > * Periodically auditing and pruning old and outdated documentation. > > > > * Promoting CentOS documentation as a reliable source of > > information > > for CentOS and enterprise Linux in general. > > > > * Working with translators to make documentation available in > > languages > > other than English. > > > > * Working with other special interest groups on their documentation > > needs and helping them create, maintain, and integrate their own > > content. > > I think this is covered under "reliable" and "pruning old and > outdated", > but I'd love to see someone take charge of doing a complete audit of > the > wiki and making it correct and authoritative. It has become a bit of > a > pile of "might be right, sometimes" over the past decade, and it's > challenging to find anything in it. Yeah, in my mind it's covered under that, but I think it's worth calling that out specifically. Wikis inevitably accumulate cruft if nobody is tending to them. -- Shaun _______________________________________________ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
