On Fri, 2021-09-17 at 14:19 +0200, Tomas Capek wrote: > Hey folks, > > I'm following up after a meeting with Rich, Karsten, and others, > where we discussed next steps towards setting up a mirror of > > https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/red-hat-enterprise-linux-documentation/rhel-8-docs > > at > > https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/docs > > Interesting question came up - how should the repo be named? > Considering that all "redhat", "centos stream", and "docs" are > already in the URL, we briefly discussed the name before Karsten > suggested bringing the question here. > > Among the proposals were: > > "modular-docs" - might be confusing with binary modules in the Stream > "enterprise-upstream" - could make sense from the perspective of > RHEL, maybe not so much from the community perspective > "linux" - this is how RHEL is called outside the context of the RH > product offering but is it widespread enough and unambiguous enough? I can't access the internal RH gitlab, but assuming these are the user- facing RHEL docs, maybe "enterprise-docs" ? I'd definitely recommend *not* using "modular-docs", that will definitely be confusing, and "linux" is probably too generic in this context. > We also need to consider that we shall start by setting up a one-way > mirror from RHEL to Stream and later switch the setup to be fully > upstream-first. I don't suppose we could rig this up to be upstream first from the beginning and make the centos-stream repo the source of truth here? Cheers Davide _______________________________________________ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
