On 8/17/20 4:19 PM, Thibaut Perrin wrote:
Hi Rich,
Just for 1), when you choose the distro you want, written in white on
blue on top of that you have a phrasing that describes (agreed, it could
be better positioned, but it's there) :
CentOS Linux
=> Consistent, manageable platform that suits a wide variety of
deployments. For some open source communities, it is a solid,
predictable base to build upon.
CentOS Stream
=> Rolling-release distro that tracks just ahead of Red Hat Enterprise
Linux (RHEL) development, positioned as a midstream between Fedora Linux
and RHEL. For anyone interested in participating and collaborating in
the RHEL ecosystem, CentOS Stream is your reliable platform for innovation.
Yes, these are good, but are both *after* you've made the choice of
which button to click. I have been told (not in writing, but just at
events) that it's not clear why one would pick one or the other. Maybe
we could do a shorter form of those as a mouseover?
I agree on the missing points, and also the "Documentation" page
includes doc for 7 & 8, even if you're on the 6.10 choice. Which means
there's not even documentation links for 6 while it's still possible to
download it ?
Oops. I hadn't noticed that. Although, we're just 2 months out from 6
EOL, so probably not something we're going to spend much time fixing,
I'd guess?
On the other points, once you choose x86_64, there should be more
guidance on the mirror page I'd say. You'll find the following ISO
files, here is a list of which you'll find and what usage.
Maybe the mirror parent page could include a readme or a redirect to the
ISO page as well for that matter ?
I think the fewest places the info is stored, the less likely we'll
forget an update when there is one.
Definitely, I agree.
Thanks,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 10:04 PM Rich Bowen <rbowen@xxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:rbowen@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
A few days ago I got email from a user who was attempting to install
CentOS. I've included their full message below, but, to summarize, when
one clicks on the "CentOS Linux" link on the front page of
centos.org <http://centos.org>
one is given a matrix of choices, and no guidance. On choosing one
option - say, x84_64 ISO, one is then given another list of options and
no guidance. Pick one of *those* options and you are yet again given a
list of options and no guidance.
Now, it could be argued that someone who doesn't know what to choose is
not our target audience, and I suppose that would be an ok position to
hold. But wouldn't it be great to lower the bar just a little, and
offer
some guidance as to which links one should click?
I'd like to see several things:
1) On the front page, where it says "We offer two Linux distros:",
there
would be at least some hint of what this choice entails
2) On the download page - https://www.centos.org/centos-linux/ - a
little explanation of what the various options there are.
So far, this is all just edits to centos.org <http://centos.org>.
The next two steps involve
pushing changes to the mirror network, and I honestly have no idea what
is involved there.
3) Adding phrasing to
http://isoredirect.centos.org/centos/8/isos/x86_64/ that indicates what
that inscrutable list of links means.
and finally, possibly not even possible:
4) Add words to http://centos4.zswap.net/8.2.2004/isos/x86_64/ (as a
random example) that say what the various options mean. This is
probably
not possible, since these are just autoindex generated pages. We could,
however, offer Apache httpd and nginx configuration recommendations
which will provide that additional information for sites that chose to
follow the instructions.
And, really, #1 and #2 are the most important here.
The full message follows:
>>
I stumbled on your address on a Centos Faq page. I hope you can give me
some sort of answer.
I have been searching for a way to ask a question, but have not located
a forum. As I am fairly new to Linux generally, I am exploring
varieties, and Centos surfaced as an interesting option. But, again, I
have a problem no one else considers worthy of asking or answering: how
do I choose? Apparently the user in the download directory is supposed
to know what they are looking for.
When I followed the link to "download CentOs", I chose a link with
".iso" on it. This opened another page, so I picked another likely
candidate. I went four or five branches deep before I gave up. I have no
idea why I would want one branch or the other. Should I just leave
CentOs to the experts?
I really wish that on the home page there was a specification for "user
level". Do developers assume that the user is expert, and that someone
who is not qualified will get exhausted and go away? It seems very
unkind to make that assumption and not say so. If I am not the intended
user, please tell me! Otherwise, could someone please explain how to
choose which version of CentOs to use?
If you could forward this letter to someone who can take the time to
answer my question, I will be grateful.
<<
_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx>
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
