Re: wiki content management via automation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21/02/18 22:30, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
> That's a good question, as we'll also have to migration for moinmoin if
> we can't find a support path to migrate to supported version anyway.
> So first question (already asked on the list) : is there a way to get in
> touch with moin people willing to help/assist us ? (as their upgrade
> tool wasn't working to test migration from 1.6 to 1.7)

it would be good if someone on the docs team ( or docs focused could
take this up, I am far too removed from implementation at this point to
drive that conversation productively ).

Other than that, +1 to engage moin upstream


> And then too : is there a way to consume a kind of API for moin that
> would then meet the "content management via automation" requirement. Or
> do we have to also investigate directly another solution (like
> mediawiki) and so migration ?

does media-wiki have an api ?

-- 
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Xfree86]     [Linux USB]     [Project Hail Cloud Computing]

  Powered by Linux