Re: discussions around upstream documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jim,

What were the outcomes from a CentOS perspective?

thank you.

regards,

bex

On 04/11/2016 06:18 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:
There is a Fedora Activity Day
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAD_Documentation_2016 ) centered around
documentation, where I'm going to see what can be done about the state
of centos documentation from upstream sources.

Most of the tooling for documentation for these two groups is centered
around git. For the most part, our documentation currently lives in the
wiki, and has a fairly high barrier to new contributors.

Would the regulars who contribute on the wiki consider consider
supporting a migration to a git based documentation workflow?

I think this would help lower the barrier to contribution by allowing
new contributors to submit a pull request or patch for documentation
rather than join a mailing list, request access, etc.

What are the thoughts or concerns about this sort of workflow change?





--
Brian (bex) Exelbierd | bex@xxxxxxxxx
+420-606-055-877 | @bexelbie
http://www.winglemeyer.org
_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Xfree86]     [Linux USB]     [Project Hail Cloud Computing]

  Powered by Linux