Re: discussions around upstream documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Christoph Galuschka
<tigalch@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 11.04.2016 um 18:18 schrieb Jim Perrin:
>>
>> There is a Fedora Activity Day
>> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAD_Documentation_2016 ) centered around
>> documentation, where I'm going to see what can be done about the state
>> of centos documentation from upstream sources.
>>
>> Most of the tooling for documentation for these two groups is centered
>> around git. For the most part, our documentation currently lives in the
>> wiki, and has a fairly high barrier to new contributors.
>>
>> Would the regulars who contribute on the wiki consider consider
>> supporting a migration to a git based documentation workflow?
>
>
> I would be fine with such a move.

Me too.

>> I think this would help lower the barrier to contribution by allowing
>> new contributors to submit a pull request or patch for documentation
>> rather than join a mailing list, request access, etc.
>
>
> Agreed. Similar to what we do with t_functional tests.
>>
>>
>> What are the thoughts or concerns about this sort of workflow change?
>>
>>
>>
>>
> all the best
> Christoph
> --
> Christoph Galuschka
> CentOS-QA-Team member | IRC: tigalch
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-docs mailing list
> CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs



[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Xfree86]     [Linux USB]     [Project Hail Cloud Computing]

  Powered by Linux