On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Christoph Galuschka <tigalch@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Jim, > > Am 11.04.2016 um 18:18 schrieb Jim Perrin: >> >> There is a Fedora Activity Day >> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAD_Documentation_2016 ) centered around >> documentation, where I'm going to see what can be done about the state >> of centos documentation from upstream sources. >> >> Most of the tooling for documentation for these two groups is centered >> around git. For the most part, our documentation currently lives in the >> wiki, and has a fairly high barrier to new contributors. >> >> Would the regulars who contribute on the wiki consider consider >> supporting a migration to a git based documentation workflow? > > > I would be fine with such a move. Me too. >> I think this would help lower the barrier to contribution by allowing >> new contributors to submit a pull request or patch for documentation >> rather than join a mailing list, request access, etc. > > > Agreed. Similar to what we do with t_functional tests. >> >> >> What are the thoughts or concerns about this sort of workflow change? >> >> >> >> > all the best > Christoph > -- > Christoph Galuschka > CentOS-QA-Team member | IRC: tigalch > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-docs mailing list > CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs _______________________________________________ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs