-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/09/2015 02:10 AM, Alan Bartlett wrote: > On 9 June 2015 at 07:55, Manuel Wolfshant > <wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > <significant snippage> >> >> Call me picky but I'd rephrase The CentOS Project ONLY provides >> updates or other changes for the latest version of each major >> branch. to The CentOS Project provides updates or other changes >> ONLY for the latest version of each major branch. > > The latter is preferable to the former (says a native Englishman). You are correct, thanks for the edit. Proper parsing of the former actually says we do nothing but "provide updates and other changes" when in fact we do many other things (including writing FAQs.) Thus the latter is accurate. I'll fix and push the changes to the main site. Also planning on taking the current UUID structure and putting them in as anchors, but I wonder if the whole table of contents autolinking magic is going to get reset? Does that mess with search results? Google doesn't seem to use deep linking ... but people do in email and forum posts. I'm going to do the anchor trick and push ahead, looking to see if all the deep links are affected. If so, I may revert and ... not sure. Perhaps put a blank entry in q.15 pointing to q.31? The only way I know around this with Moin Moin is to do anchors and make up your own ToC manually. :/ - - Karsten - -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade .^\ CentOS Doer of Stuff http://TheOpenSourceWay.org \ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlV3PRgACgkQ2ZIOBq0ODEEvTACfZ8mDZdj3/fKFUiGjs3Sz+bs9 dEUAoNp5V2C3+VLpD8Mh8vHriBj8SkgK =UXhj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
