Re: Update for FAQ - q.15 & q.31 update & merge

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/05/2015 08:30 PM, Karsten Wade wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Folks:

A few of us (KB, Johnny, myself) have begun work on updating the main
FAQs on the CentOS wiki. Mainly that means looking over and updating
for any changes that have been going on in the last 18 months as the
project has expanded to include SIG releases, monthly updates of many
new types, new hardware architectures, and so forth.

For this first update we've got this from the FAQ:

q.15:
http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/General#head-6e2c3746ec45ac3142917466760321e8
68f43c0e
q.31
http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/General#head-dcca41e9a3d5ac4c6d900a991990fd11
930867d6

The first item is that these questions are repetitive, so I'd like to
combine them in to a single answer. Second is that version numbering
has expanded, so we need to cover monthly updates and so forth.

Circling around on this, we ended up with the following complete
rewrite that would replace q.31 and retire q.15 (thereby making q.31
in to q.30.) How does this update sound?

If we're close enough, I'll push it to live at the start of next week,
and we can always continue iterating on it.

The text below is in Moin Moin format; I was going to do a diff
between the versions but then we differed so wildly in combining and
rewriting that I think a mental diff will work better. A formatted
draft is here:

http://wiki.centos.org/KarstenWade/GeneralFAQUpdateq31q15

Thanks - Karsten

I'd say that at least the following paragraphs from q15 are worth preserving: - Any point release is just a "snapshot" with previous updates, plus the latest batch of new upstream updates, rolled into a new [base] repo with an initially empty [updates] repo. - There is a CentOS Vault containing older CentOS trees. This vault is a picture of the older tree when it was removed from the main tree, and does not receive updates. It should only be used for reference.

After " If you are using an older minor version than the latest in a given branch, then you are missing security and bugfix updates." I'd also emphasize that we offer no support for these configurations, something along: For this reason old minor releases are never supported. If you want/need to "freeze" at an old point release you are entirely on your own.


wolfy, tired of people who fail to understand what minor releases are and keep pushing in IRC for support of old[er] stuff
_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Xfree86]     [Linux USB]     [Project Hail Cloud Computing]

  Powered by Linux