Re: Documentation SIG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Mar 13, 2014 6:12 AM, "Jim Perrin" <jperrin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 03/12/2014 09:39 AM, Tim Krupinski wrote:
> > Hey all -
> >
> > Just curious to find out if there's any activity with the documentation
> > SIG?  I'd like to join.  One thing i've noticed is that it seems like
> > documentation for CentOS ends at 5.  While the documentation is more or
> > less mirrored from RedHat's site, this can be confusing to beginners since
> > they may get the impression that documentation isn't there.
>
> Most of the activity has been around things other than docs, but you do
> bring up a good point. We *need* to address this.
>
> With the 6.x documentation, there was a licensing change that
> complicates things for us. Changes to the documentation mean that you
> can't redistribute. Oracle appears to work around this by shipping the
> official pdf documentation.
...
> --
> Jim Perrin

Can you be more specific about this licencing change? As far as I've read so far, RHEL7 guides are CC-BY-SA 3.0 - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ - which makes them fair game for adaptation and redistribution as long as you give attribution.

The docbook sources are a different issue, but IMO there's an argument to be made for sharing them given the increased collaboration potential.

--Pete

_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Xfree86]     [Linux USB]     [Project Hail Cloud Computing]

  Powered by Linux