On 03/13/2014 07:12 AM, Jim Perrin wrote: > On 03/12/2014 09:39 AM, Tim Krupinski wrote: >> Hey all - >> >> Just curious to find out if there's any activity with the documentation >> SIG? I'd like to join. One thing i've noticed is that it seems like >> documentation for CentOS ends at 5. While the documentation is more or >> less mirrored from RedHat's site, this can be confusing to beginners since >> they may get the impression that documentation isn't there. > > Most of the activity has been around things other than docs, but you do > bring up a good point. We *need* to address this. Another thing to consider, and I don't know if I've seen elsewhere, is whether there'll be a 'standard' way to produce documentation for variants / anything produced by SIGs. Will that just go on the wiki? Should it be full-blown DocBook guides like the official upstream docs? Will every SIG just make that decision on their own? (In a perfect world, documentation for all variants would be similar and not a Frankenstein's monster mix of wiki, DocBook, or whatever else.) I guess the Xen4CentOS project would be the current poster child for variants? Looks like that documentation lives on the wiki: http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/Xen4-01 Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb@xxxxxxxxxx | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/ _______________________________________________ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs