Re: [CentOS-docs] New page: HowTos/JavaRuntimeEnvironment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/04/2011 01:42 AM, Alan Bartlett wrote:
> On 3 June 2011 23:34, Manuel Wolfshant<wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>> On 06/03/2011 10:56 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
>>> Alan Bartlett wrote on 06/03/2011 03:32 PM:
>>>> One comment. I thought linkage of the libjavaplugin_jni.so file is redundant?
>>> May be superstitious behavior on my part.  I saw it recommended
>>> somewhere to use both and have followed that, but it seems to work fine
>>> without the libjavaplugin_jni.so link, but the link does not seem to
>>> cause problems.  That can be deleted if not needed.
>> I am 100% sure that on x86_64 libnpjp2.so is enough (that's what I use).
>> On the other arch however, if I am not mistaken (I have no i386 system
>> handy for testing until Monday) I am accustomed to using
>> libjavaplugin_jni .
> Just for you, Wolfy, freshly harvested from a working 32-bit system --
>
> [quote]
> [ajb@GX1 plugins]$ pwd
> /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
> [ajb@GX1 plugins]$ ls -1
> libflashplayer.so
> libnpjp2.so
> mplayerplug-in-dvx.so
> mplayerplug-in-dvx.xpt
> mplayerplug-in-qt.so
> mplayerplug-in-qt.xpt
> mplayerplug-in-rm.so
> mplayerplug-in-rm.xpt
> mplayerplug-in.so
> mplayerplug-in-wmp.so
> mplayerplug-in-wmp.xpt
> mplayerplug-in.xpt
> nsdejavu.so
> [ajb@GX1 plugins]$
> [/quote]
>
> Alan.
great, thanks. I've updated the wiki page and left only libnpjp2.

_______________________________________________
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Xfree86]     [Linux USB]     [Project Hail Cloud Computing]

  Powered by Linux