On 06/03/2011 10:56 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote: > Alan Bartlett wrote on 06/03/2011 03:32 PM: >> One comment. I thought linkage of the libjavaplugin_jni.so file is redundant? > May be superstitious behavior on my part. I saw it recommended > somewhere to use both and have followed that, but it seems to work fine > without the libjavaplugin_jni.so link, but the link does not seem to > cause problems. That can be deleted if not needed. I am 100% sure that on x86_64 libnpjp2.so is enough (that's what I use). On the other arch however, if I am not mistaken (I have no i386 system handy for testing until Monday) I am accustomed to using libjavaplugin_jni . _______________________________________________ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
