On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 2:54 PM, PJ Welsh <pjwelsh at gmail.com> wrote: > > The list is not deciding these matters. There is no vote. There is > only situational reluctance to allow content by certain people. I > think maybe that (potential) page hits could be a better metric than > the seemingly random way we have now. I haven't really seen situations where people were denied complete access, just situations where there were some (maybe a tad harsh) discussions. IIRC. > I think it is sad that this part of the CentOS "community" can not > seem to allow good people to focus on the areas they can "contribute". > Or does not allow ?a member not contribute information that will help > correctly and repeatedly and easily (aka spoon feed?) produce positive > results with CentOS as the foundation OS. Where does that happen? Not enabling people to contribute, that is? Ralph
