Hi List my question to everyone is. What is exactly wrong with having helpful documentation on the centos wiki? Does it really matter if the original maintainer documents his app. I for one love the fact i can search threw the wiki and get app#1 working and I also know the procedure has gone threw peer review and i am fairly comfortable it is secure practice. I for one contributed the Multi-Media portion and as many have called it pointless at one time or another All i know is my personal blog gets a few thousand hits per month and I can only imagine the centos wiki gets 100 times more hits. According to multiple post this document should not live on the wiki cause lets be honest 90% of the installed apps to get a full multimedia experience reside outside of what centos ships. I think any documentation is good. I agree maybe docs on how to use grep might be pointless in 90% of the user base but anything that simplifies or paints the nice picture adds to the community. I for one after seeing all the mess with the domain names and the funds and now the wiki feel like centos is imploding on itself. I believe the point of the wiki is un-official documentation and considering all of it is coming from users contributing it, who am i to say good or bad or pointless. I for one have found multiple items in the wiki helpful and believe that limiting content will turn more and more people away. my 2 cents which is not worth much if you factor in the exchange rate.
