I didn't mean to start a holy war here! ;) Bash is also ok ;) 2009/5/12 R P Herrold <herrold at centos.org>: > On Tue, 12 May 2009, William L. Maltby wrote: > >> >> On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 11:42 -0400, R P Herrold wrote: > >>>> For widest possible coverage, something like bash should be considered. >>> curious -- when coding under that criterion, I end up at: >>> ? ? ?/bin/sh >>> in my script's shebang ? ;) > >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Apr ?1 17:17 /bin/sh -> bash >> >> As it should be. > > The use of a link is not a statement that /bin/sh behaves as > bash; ?the interpreter notes how it was called, and acts to > the shell dialect restrictions chosen by how it is invoked. > > -- Russ herrold > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-docs mailing list > CentOS-docs at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs >
