On Tue, 12 May 2009, William L. Maltby wrote: > For widest possible coverage, something like bash should be considered. curious -- when coding under that criterion, I end up at: /bin/sh in my script's shebang ;) -- Russ herrold
On Tue, 12 May 2009, William L. Maltby wrote: > For widest possible coverage, something like bash should be considered. curious -- when coding under that criterion, I end up at: /bin/sh in my script's shebang ;) -- Russ herrold