New Wiki Page

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 9 May 2009, David Dreggors wrote:

> Dag, this seems confusing to me...
>
>> No, the kmod-ath5k works, but does have a problem when the interface is
>> brought down.
>
> In this first sentence you say the kmod-ath5k does have a problem when
> the interface is brought down.
>
>> This is not a problem with the kmod-ath5k, it happens with the
>> ath5k from 2.6.18-141 and 2.6.18-144 as well (which is a backport of the
>> Fedora 10 ath5k module which I presume works fine in F10).
>
> In this next sentence however says that it (kmod-ath5k) is not where
> this issue is but rather it is in the ath5k backport for
> 2.6.18-141/2.6.18-144.
>
> I am lost does this happen on the kmod-ath5k or not?

Read it again. The problem exists in where the driver comes from. So 
evidently it is also in the kmod. So it is not a kmod issue.

-- 
--   dag wieers,  dag at centos.org,  http://dag.wieers.com/   --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Xfree86]     [Linux USB]     [Project Hail Cloud Computing]

  Powered by Linux