Akemi Yagi wrote: > IMVHO (in my very honest opinion), the web site *is* dated. As we > have seen more than a few times in this thread and other places, this > is because only a small number of devs can edit the web site and those > are the ones who are always extremely busy and cannot give higher > priorities to this task. Dont think I've actually seen a single request from anyone for wider edit rights on the website, where should I have been looking ? > The following options come to my mind as possible ways to handle the > situation like that: > > (1) Move as much stuff out of the web site as we can to the areas > where CentOS contributors have edit access. This is basically what > Ned was proposing. that does not fix anything. the wiki is not in a state where we could move most of the content to, so we need a replacement website. And if we are going to do a website - we might as well think it through and get it mostly right. We dont need to be perfect with everything, but trying never hurt. > (2) Find (a) community member(s) who can be trusted as (a) web > maintainer(s). This option can be extended to "finding and recruiting > new CentOS team members/developers". ... > (3) Do nothing. Maintaining the web site is not important. > > I'm sure no one would agree (3) is a solution. But if we do not come > up with viable solutions and start actively working on it, we would > end up with (3). Isnt (2.9) where we are now ? -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219@icq
