On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Ned Slider <ned@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > it's just that > IMHO the whole site looks dated and to an extent unmaintained. IMVHO (in my very honest opinion), the web site *is* dated. As we have seen more than a few times in this thread and other places, this is because only a small number of devs can edit the web site and those are the ones who are always extremely busy and cannot give higher priorities to this task. The following options come to my mind as possible ways to handle the situation like that: (1) Move as much stuff out of the web site as we can to the areas where CentOS contributors have edit access. This is basically what Ned was proposing. (2) Find (a) community member(s) who can be trusted as (a) web maintainer(s). This option can be extended to "finding and recruiting new CentOS team members/developers". (3) Do nothing. Maintaining the web site is not important. I'm sure no one would agree (3) is a solution. But if we do not come up with viable solutions and start actively working on it, we would end up with (3). Akemi
