Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Ralph Angenendt <ra+centos@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Ned Slider wrote: > >>> Also, whilst undergoing this process, would it also be a good time to >>> request and/or formalize a documentation SIG as there doesn't appear to >>> be one at present. Presumably those who have raised their hands would be >>> obvious candidates for such a SIG. >> Ummm. I thought this was it? Or please rephrase what you mean by >> "documentation SIG" ... > > Well, it is listed under "Future SIGs": > > http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup > > Akemi Yes, that's all I meant :-)
