Ned Slider wrote: > Having given this much thought (mostly around my available free time), > if it's not too late I'd also like to also raise my hand and in so doing > give this thread a little bump. Good, let us get this on the way then (I'm sorry, I'm not really available on weekends at the moment so things on a slightly larger scale take a while). > Also, whilst undergoing this process, would it also be a good time to > request and/or formalize a documentation SIG as there doesn't appear to > be one at present. Presumably those who have raised their hands would be > obvious candidates for such a SIG. Ummm. I thought this was it? Or please rephrase what you mean by "documentation SIG" ... Cheers, Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 194 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20081102/66ddc8cf/attachment.bin
