Misters, FYI : http://www.informationweek.com/news/software/linux/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=207100950 Part of the purpose of the summit, now in its second year, is to let business users interact with Linux kernel developers. One IT pro glad to have the opportunity was Ed Reaves, a Nortel technology platform manager from Research Triangle Park, N.C. End users and server admins are happy with Linux's current five-nines uptime, Reaves said, but Nortel and other telecom companies would like to move Linux reliability to six nines, or one outage of about 30 seconds a year. In response, Nortel's Linux developers produced a block of code that restarts Linux in 20 seconds in the event of a glitch; however, that patch doesn't appear to be moving into the kernel, to the dismay of Nortel executives. "How do you get a kernel patch released into the mainline?" Reaves asked, referring to the development process that steers additions to the kernel past reviewers and into a hierarchical code tree maintained by Linus Torvalds. That led to a discussion of the difficulties inherent in the code review process that must happen before a proposed patch makes its way into the kernel. "The limiting resource is not development of code but review of code," said Jonathan Corbet, a kernel developer. The Nortel patch, it turns out, is a sizable block of code requiring reviewers with knowledge of a particular part of the kernel. I look forward to Your Answer, Best Regards, Guillaume FORTAINE "I have root @ Google"