Re: [SIG^2 G-TEC] Prevx Home v1.0 Instrusion Prevention Features Can Be Disabled by Direct Service Table Restoration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: <chewkeong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <bugtraq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [SIG^2 G-TEC] Prevx Home v1.0 Instrusion Prevention Features Can Be Disabled by Direct Service Table Restoration
From: <dullien@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 22:35:17 -0800
References: <20041122121935.25185.qmail@www.securityfocus.com>

Hey all,

isn't this sort of irrelevant ? If the ACL's are set in a way
to allow an attacker to write to /device/physicalmemory, any
sort of protection mechanism is immediately moot...

Cheers,
dullien@xxxxxx

References:
- [SIG^2 G-TEC] Prevx Home v1.0 Instrusion Prevention Features Can Be Disabled by Direct Service Table Restoration
  - From: chewkeong

Prev by Date: [CLA-2004:896] Conectiva Security Announcement - bugzilla
Next by Date: Re: Incorrect reporting of the Bofra/The Register exploit
Previous by thread: [SIG^2 G-TEC] Prevx Home v1.0 Instrusion Prevention Features Can Be Disabled by Direct Service Table Restoration
Next by thread: Hardware support for XP SP2 DEP not enabled by default ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Security] [Netfilter] [PHP] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel]

Powered by Linux