Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 3/7] bpf: enhance subregister bounds deduction logic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Oct 22, 2023 at 01:57:39PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> Add handling of a bunch of possible cases which allows deducing extra
> information about subregister bounds, both u32 and s32, from full register
> u64/s64 bounds.
> 
> Also add smin32/smax32 bounds derivation from corresponding umin32/umax32
> bounds, similar to what we did with smin/smax from umin/umax derivation in
> previous patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>

Forgot to add

Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@xxxxxxxx>

And that the acked-by for this and previous patches applies to future
version of the patchset as well.

Q: I going through the patches rather slowly, one by one, and sending
acked-by as I go, is that considered too verbose? Is it be better to spend
the time to go through the entire patchset first and just send an acked-by
to the cover letter?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux