Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: don't assume SHT_GNU_verdef presence for SHT_GNU_versym section

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

On Mon, 16 Oct 2023 11:28:40 -0700 you wrote:
> Fix too eager assumption that SHT_GNU_verdef ELF section is going to be
> present whenever binary has SHT_GNU_versym section. It seems like either
> SHT_GNU_verdef or SHT_GNU_verneed can be used, so failing on missing
> SHT_GNU_verdef actually breaks use cases in production.
> 
> One specific reported issue, which was used to manually test this fix,
> was trying to attach to `readline` function in BASH binary.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] libbpf: don't assume SHT_GNU_verdef presence for SHT_GNU_versym section
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/137df1189d12

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux